Monday, 29 April 2013

Complaints Against Mantri Developers has forged papers

Mantri Developers has forged papers

Leader of the Opposition in Bruhat Bangalore Mahanagara Palike Council M. Nagaraj on Friday accused Mantri Developers Pvt. Ltd. of forging the khata (title deed) and khata extract of one of its projects in the city.
Demanding a CBI probe, he alleged that the documents for Mantri Tranquil Apartments on Kanakapura Road in Bangalore South taluk, Uttarahalli hobli, Gubbalalu village, had been forged. The apartment complex, with 1,035 flats, had come up on 19 acres and 37 guntas of land, coming under survey numbers 7, 9 and 13, he told presspersons on Friday.
“As per the panchayat records, the land has been registered by Mantri Developers under the names of D.V. Mallikarjun, J.M. Subramanya and G. Srinivas Rangan. The khata number is 1208/ 7,9,13. However, after the BBMP was formed, the developers should have applied for a fresh khata,” he claimed.
He alleged that the developers had created a fake khata certificate and khata extract documents (dated July 13, 2007). The forged khata number is 1206/ 7,9,13.


According to the declaration of the Assistant Revenue Officer, Uttarahalli Subdivision, property belonging to Chakrapani Venkatesh and Lakshmi Madhav Rao has been registered under khata number 1206. The developers had taken this khata number and added the relevant survey numbers to create fake documents,” he charged.
Mr. Nagaraj said that in response to a Right to Information Act application, the Revenue officials stated that the khata extract (bearing challan number 150230) had not been issued by the Uttarahalli Subdivision office. They also confirmed that both the khata certificate and extract were fake.


Hinting that this was part of a big scam, he claimed that there were several other cases where big developers had created fake documents for land in the erstwhile seven CMCs, one TMC and 110 villages and cheated hundreds of people.
“Of the 1,035 flats in Mantri Tanquil, over 800 have already been registered. What will be the fate of people who have taken bank loans to buy their dwellings based on these fake documents? The question is will their documents will be regularised,” Mr. Nagaraj asked.


He said that even after the BBMP was formed on January 16, 2007, the Bangalore Development Authority continues to issue Occupancy Certificates (OC) to properties in the newly added areas without checking the veracity of documents. “The civic authority is losing crores of rupees in revenue. This is being done in the interests of the big developers,” he charged.


Kiran Kumar, associate vice-president, Mantri Developers, rubbished the allegations. He said that his company was a reputed one which had completed 20 projects.
“The Government would not have kept quiet for so long if the documents were fake. Also, we have won the Best Builder Award for the project in question. There is no substance in the allegations levelled by Mr. Nagaraj,” he pointed out.
“We can assure that there have been no irregularities from our end and none of the customers will be affected.”


Mayor S.K. Nataraj told presspersons later that he would direct officials to look into Mr. Nagaraj's allegation. “If it is found to be true, we will initiate stringent action against the developers and the officials responsible. The BBMP will levy a penalty and initiate legal action,” he said.
The Mayor also said that he had discussed the OC issue with Chief Minister and the city in-charge Ministers.
“I have apprised them of BBMP's revenue loss. They have directed the Urban Development Department to issue a circular giving the BBMP powers to issue OC again. Even if the BDA has issued OC, the BBMP has powers to inspect and levy fine in case of deviations,” he added.



I had purchased a flat at Mantry Synergy, Chennai, FROM MANTRI DEVELOPERS, BANGALURU, (flat 5floor H BLOCK NUMBER -502, receipt number- mbplsynrg08248) .

The developers have sold the open terrace which is illegal

. The builder has not provided even a single water source for 765 apartments. He has not provided (a) water treatment plant, (b) an efficient rain water harvesting system, (c) an efficient

sewage and water treatment plant. although these conditions are stipulated in the plan permit. He has converted the open space into parking lots and sold to the residents. He has not provided the common area calculation statement. The built up area is lesser

than the area (by about 10 percent) shown in the drawing. Has not provided 1000 watts backup as specified but only 600wats. Has not provided to me the approved plan and permit. Has not fulfilled the

conditions laid out in the Panchayat /DTCP permit given to them. He has not provided the completion certificate. HAS not provided the solar heating system, a condition in the plan permit.He had charged about Rs 3 lakh for parking lot which is against the SC judgement


Complaints Against Properties of Mantri, Jagan raided in Bangalore

Properties of Mantri, Jagan raided in Bangalore

Bangalore, August 18,

Sleuths of the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) on Thursday swooped down on Mantri Developers' office on Vittal Mallya Road off St Mark's Road and Lok Sabha MP Y S Jaganmohan Reddy's palatial house on Bagalur Main Road on Thursday morning.
The raid on Reddy’s house and on Mantri Developers’ establishment was part of a coordinated action by the CBI which launched search operations in Hyderabad following directions by the Andhra Pradesh High Court a few days ago. The area was cordoned off by plainclothes policemen and people were not allowed entry.

Sources said Mantri Developers’ chief Sushil Mantri was not in office at the time of raid and is said to be out of town.  A fortnight back, Mantri was summoned by the CBI to the agency’s Delhi headquarters and was grilled for nearly three days. 

The CBI is keen to dig into Sushil Mantri’s association with former Andhra Pradesh chief minister Y S Rajasekara Reddy and his son Jagan. They are also eager to know if the two had business dealings in which the Kadapa MP might have been benefited. 

Sources said Reddy’s mansion in Bangalore on a 22-acre plot was built by Mantri Developers. They suspect that Mantri and Reddy together floated a company, Brahmini Real Estate, which is jointly developing a project on 350 acres near Hyderabad airport. 
Sources said that the investigating agency would continue with the search and seizure operation till Friday evening. 

The documents and other evidence unearthed from the raids on Mantri Developers and Reddy’s bungalow would be shared with the CBI branch in Hyderabad where they would collated to bolster the agency’s case against the former Andhra Pradesh chief minister’s son.

Complaints Against Mantri Developers Private Limted

Mantri Developers Private Limted

Buyers Beware
This is for all those who have booked their apartments at Mantri Navratna. Please BEWARE before signing the final sale deed as the entire property is under mortgage to Punjab National Bank, Commercial Street who also are issuing a ”No Objection Letter to Register”, which is a fraud being played out on the consumers as although the registration can be carried out the property does not become ”Free from Encumbrance”. Hence in case at a future period Mantri cannot pay back to bank for some reason then you will loose your property and the legal remedy for you at that point of time would be to file a civil case for damages against Mantri by paying 1) Court fees equivalent to 10% of the claim amount, 2) Advocate fees & 3) Slog it out in the court of law for years.
Please observe the clause in the sale deed and if you cannot understand then please approach a good advocate for advice.
A well wisher

Complaints Against Mantri Builders - worst commitment

Mantri developers are name sake Banglore #1 developers, Its a real blunder to rate them as top#1. Even I believe because of the rating they had, but now I realised that Mantri is a useless organization in terms of commitment. They have no commitment at all, they would have forgot about the meaning of commitment too. Starting from the Vice president of chennai operations until the down the line marketing respresentatives all are bluff masters. I wonder if Mr.Sushil Mantri, MD who build this Mantri empire is aware of this. For the Mantri Synergy project which they started in Chennai in 2007, Mantri missed 4 deadlines till now and again postponed the possession to mid 2011. I wonder if they ever keep promises. All the ladies and gentlemen who wants to buy any property with them, be sure that in the construction agreement, they will mention that they will pay a penalty of around 2.5 to 3RS per SFT for the delayed period, but they will not mention the end date of penalty in the construction agreement. So you will be ended up paying both the bank loans and rent which is proportionally more than 15 times than what the penalty they paid to you. I agree that every builder has challenges like non availability of cement or labor, but not such that they missed 4 deadlines which is not acceptable by any customer or atleast me. All Mantri victims, please place your complaints here so that we would have helped someone not to become a victim like us.

Complaints against Service Tax charged by Mantri Developers.

Service Tax charged by Mantri Developers. complaints Complaint
All the customers of Mantri Celista received service tax notification just 15 days back with info to pay service tax at 4.12% immediatly or pay panelty @ 18%. All the customer do have questions but not getting any satisfication answer from builder representatives.

My question is as follows:--

1. Where is the mention of service tax-rate @ 4.12% ? 

2. It very specifically mention in point 6 that service tax is levy on the pending construction till the issuance of “completion certificate”. I/We have paid the money based on the construction. We paid amounts on each stage of construction completion, for Ex paid amount at 10th floor roof slab completion then 15th floor. At each stage we should have got the “completion certificate” from Mantri “Architect” Or “Chartered Engineer” OR ”licensed surveyor” Right…? 

And the law specifically share that information that their certificate should be taken in to consideration to determine the service tax liability. 

3. Also in the XLS file construction value is taken at 68.4% where it should be 67% as specified in your document 

Q.1 In this case why are we getting charged at 4.12% ? 

Q.2 Why Mantri is not considering the “Completion Certificate” fact and charge customer on pending amount 1st july 2010? 

Q.3 Why the calculation of construction at 68.4% and not 67% ? 

Complaints Against MANTRI DEVELOPERS


I had purchased a flat at Mantry Synergy, Chennai.The developers have sold the open terrace which is illegal. The builder has not provided
1.even a single water source for 765 apartments
2..He has not provided(a) water treatment plant ,(b) an efficient rain water harvesting system,(c) an efficient sewage and 
water treatment plant
3.,has converted the open space into parking lots and sold to the residents,
4. Has not provided the common area calculation statement
5. The built up area is lesser than the area (by about 10 percent) shown in the drawing
5,Has not provided 1000 watts backup as specified but only 600wats
6.Has not provided to me the approved plan and permit
7. Has not fulfilled the conditions laid out in the Panchayat permit given to them
8, Has not provided the completion certificate